Right to Information Act 2005 mandates timely response to citizen requests for government information. It is an initiative taken by Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions to provide a– RTI Portal Gateway to the citizens for quick search of information on the details of first Appellate.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Right to Information Act, 2005 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. | |||
|
| ||
Archives:1 |
RTInation was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 December 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Right to Information Act, 2005 on 14 December 2011. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program. |
Archives | |
---|---|
|
Untitled[edit]
Ranjesh Singh At-Bhagalpur Bihar Right Hend Saide
Recent changes by User:Pdbhatia , User:Onkarr[edit]
This is an article on the Right to Information Act 2005. It is not an article on RTI movement, RTI activism etc. Kindly confine yourselves to the subject and refrain from POV pushing, promoting a particular external website etc. Aghore (talk) 08:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Add CIC Landmark Judgement 'Political Parties Under RTI '[edit]
I added CIC chief Landmark judgement 'Political parties under RTI. Pls further add more information on this section. ThinkingYouth (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
CIC landmark Judgement on Political parties inclusion in RTI ,I request an individual page should be created about it,discussing history of this CIC judgement and add Role and Contribution of ADR Reform activists and RTI Activist Subhash Aggarwal on this Historic and Landmark Judgement. ThinkingYouthtalkThinkingYouth (talk) 06:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please refer this article: Save RTI. The 'Background' section of the article has mention of Mr. Anil Bairwal and Mr. S. C. Agrawal. - Navinpc (talk) 30 September 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 11:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Content removal[edit]
Why is content sourced to humanrightsinitiative.org being removed? They meet WP:RS. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
hlw[edit]
hlw sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:590:3C03:B3:59E4:850A:10BE:2049 (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 16 October 2015[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved pending G6 deletion to make room. Non controversial, and consistent with policy. Tiggerjay (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Tiggerjay (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
(non-admin closure)Right to Information Act → Right to Information Act, 2005 – the current title is not the actual name of Act, so I propose a redirect to full name -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo(talk·contribs·count) 09:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support, per nom and MOS:LAW. this link confirms that 'Right to Information Act, 2005' is the correct title. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Right_to_Information_Act,_2005&oldid=808675382'
Views 109,474
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
ActionsDownloads
Comments
Likes
Embeds 0
Information in computers can not be hidden